18 February 2011

Social Media ROI

 Social Media ROI – Can you measure it fully?

Most of the businesses realize the Social Media Benefits, however how much to spend and its trade-off with money is debatable. Infact, finding return on investment (ROI) itself is a tough job. Let us look at it a little closer.

Worried about Social Media ROI?
Returns on investment are measured in monitory terms most of the times. Marketers usually measure it as Net present value of stream of revenues vs monitory expenditure.
In terms of percentage it is
ROI= [(Amount Gained from Investment – Cost of Investment)/Cost of Investment] x 100
ROI of Social Media doesn’t change much in its definition. After all, a business is a business is a business. It must earn more than it spends. However, most of the times Net Present Value of revenues is difficult to measure when it is Social Media, mainly because it revolves around Brand Awareness and conversations more than anything else.

Many companies fear that there’s no true way to measure the ROI of social media activities. In comparison to other marketing channels such as e-mail, SEO, and display advertising, social media doesn’t offer a very direct or concrete ROI measurement.
This is partly due to the fact that social media interactions revolve mostly around online conversations, which are not as easy to measure quantitatively as click-throughs and CPMs. Because social media is very much about the qualitative and not quantitative, this result in much debate about what metrics are truly useful and accurate when it comes to social media marketing.
Just because measuring social media ROI is a challenge doesn’t mean it’s impossible. The world of social media ROI is still evolving. We may have to rethink traditional metrics to include the ways that people interact with social media. The measurement of returns through social media isn’t done the mathematical way!
For example, the standard metrics for e-mail marketing include delivery, open and click-through rates. While it’s still possible to find value in measuring click-throughs from specific URLs on sites such as Twitter or YouTube, social media also lends itself to new categories of measurement, such as activity and engagement.
Now, how can we measure engagement? Let’s consider engagement to be a category of interaction that includes posts/threads, comments, tags, votes, bookmarks, and more. This can be done quantitatively (for metric lovers); however categorizing them under positive, negative and neutral heads makes more sense before we could realize the returns. This accounts for qualitative measures where extent of positive conversations should outnumber the negative and neutral. Viral content is a blessing!
Another important area of measurement for social media is brand awareness. Traditional media might measure brand and awareness through reach and frequency: how many people have seen an ad and how many times they’ve seen it. For Social Media, there are technologies that measure posts for positive and negative sentiments, and which measure “share of voice” (i.e. the number of articles, tweets, posts, etc. in which a specific brand is mentioned in comparison to its competitors).
Although the world of social media brings with it new ways of measuring activities and interactions, the traditional ROI metrics of revenue – cost savings, conversions, cost per lead, etc.– are still what matters when it comes to proving the value of your social media marketing initiatives. Try categorizing leads into Inbound Vs Outbound leads to start measuring returns.
An inbound lead may get to know about your business via Tweet, then read your blog, and later contact you via email. Therefore, try not to get more granular that Inbound leads as it will add up to time and efforts.
By establishing a baseline and measuring progress over time, companies can begin to see the effects of social media on growth and revenue.

Land disputes: costing India 100 Billion Dollars


Land disputes is costing India 100 Billion Dollars of Investment!


We very well know the story of Tata Nano Land Dispute. What was West Bengal’s loss though was Gujarat’s profit.

However, most of the projects are not as lucky as Nano to get a Land replacement. 70% of total 190 projects that were supposed to be implemented have been stalled due to Land acquisition related disputes. The ECO Pulse study by ASSOCHAM has revealed this startling fact.

Most of these projects are basically International companies needing to set their shop in India.

For e.g: 22 major steel projects in the country worth USD 82 billion are being held up because of procedural delays in obtaining environmental impact assessment clearance and delays in land acquisition mainly due to public protests. One such project – Arcelor Mittal which nearly pulled out of building 2 steel plants that would pump close to USD 20 billion. The reason – They were unable to acquire land in Jharkhand and Orissa.

There are currently 18 strangled projects of India Inc to the tune of Rs.244,815.5 crore (Rs.2.45 trillion) remained on papers, in the form of memorandum of understanding (MoU) and agreements over the past three-four years.

If at all these projects had been implemented, it would have created Jobs for 164,000 people directly and 270,000 people indirectly !

Although, It is important for farmers to safeguard their lands – But the compensation offerings are very much in line with Market & Real Estate conditions. Its not pointing here that Farmers should get a raw deal – Its their land, they have right to decide what to do with their lands.

Why is government not intervening. This is a win-win situation. If Indian Government takes these projects seriously, There are plenty of solutions available to overcome these Land disputes.

smaller cities: Bigger opportunities

Bigger opportunity in India's smaller cities



Smaller cities are scoring over metros in terms of growing urbanisation, and cities such as Jalandhar, Aurangabad, Bhubhaneshwar, Agra and Raipur are believed to be the next ‘cities of opportunities’.

According to the latest Morgan Stanley research report, ‘AlphaWise City Vibrancy Index: A Guide to India’s Urbanization’, households in these cities earn more than India’s average urban household.

Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) pegs the quarterly average household income at about Rs 45,000 per urban household, whereas in cities such as Jalandhar, Bhubaneswar, Guwahati and Aurangabad have a quarterly average household income of above Rs 65,000.

The report measures the key drivers of urbanisation such as physical infrastructure, financial penetration, consumer services and job listings in the top 200 cities (by population) in India. The vibrancy index is aimed at helping investors evaluate companies’ strategic positioning in urban centers and monitor sector trends.

Urbanisation is important to the process of city formation and building India’s competitive strength in the global markets, feels Ridham Desai, head of India research and India strategist at Morgan Stanley. The relative performance of components of the vibrancy index could give us insight into potential for urbanisation. For example, a city’s rate of urbanisation may be low but it may be (that) financial penetration may be high. This gives us potential for consumer services or job creation in that city.

Bangalore, Hyderabad and Pune are the most vibrant cities among the top 50 cities in India on the AlphaWise City Vibrancy Index. Tier-II cities like Mysore and Meerut rank in the top 10. Ironically, the country’s financial capital, Mumbai, ranks 21st among India’s top 50 cities.